In the UAE, Etisalat is the best company for its mechanism of internet and mobiles. Some people prefer that Etisalat blocks some websites. Others think that it is not good and people have the right to enter any website. This essay will talk about the pros and cons of blocking or allowing websites.
There are some major arguments for blocking. The first benefit of blocking websites is safety for children. For example, when Etisalat blocks bad website the children can’t enter them. Secondly, stopping the hackers from teaching people who can’t learn hacking from the website is a good idea. Last argument is that it blocks against bad political websites, because some people learn bad things from these websites and they find false information about countries.
However, there are many important reasons against blocking websites. The first point against is that, Etisalat cannot allow some websites about married life and that causes divorce. Secondly, blocking all political sites and that causes political ignorance of people. Finally, each website has different information, which is like a double-edged sword you can use it in either a good or bad way.
In conclusion, both methods blocking websites and allowing them have advantages. However, I prefer blocking bad websites than allowing them because we can use books to learn specific things better and this protects people.
No comments:
Post a Comment